With Thanksgiving upon us, I thought I'd talk about one of many things I appreciate about my current lab. You may recall that I do most of my research at the non-university research institution where Research Advisor works. There are hardly any students there full time, so the staff is an assortment of PIs, post docs, and technicians. It has a much more collaborative culture since lab groups aren't comprised of several students who are all responsible for different projects. We are more or less focused on the same goals and since the techs are paid to do the work they are assigned, there aren't the territorial conflicts that can crop up in university labs. One of the benefits of this structure is that everyone is interested in what you're doing.
It can be very isolating to be in a lab where your project is a little different from the principle themes of the group. Or to be in a department where the faculty research interests are diverse so no other labs are doing work similar to your lab. It can limit collaboration and hamper enthusiasm if no one ever wants to talk shop with you because they work in a different shop. Sure, exposure to different ideas can be great, but if the ideas are so different that no one wants to explain them to you, it doesn't do much good to be in a diverse department. And it can really suck if most other people are doing similar work but yours is very different. Then you just feel left out. You suffer a little when there's no one to pick your nits.
I am thankful that I can talk to Awesome Technician about any little issue and she'll both know what I'm talking about and be interested. I like that everyone faces similar practical problems so we can all tackle them together, or at least get decent advice because other people have thought about the problem too. I also like that since we don't operate in separate little domains, we team up when work really needs to get done (e.g. it's pretty easy to assemble a crew for field work). Money is allocated from several different projects, so there is some level of assigning effort to particular grants, but overall we operate as a unit.
There are downsides to anything, however, and this is no exception. For example, I think we are prone to isolation. And we all get along pretty well, but I could imagine that one bad egg could really hinder productivity in a situation like ours. Also, it takes strong leadership to direct people who don't take ownership of their work like grad students do. Scientists aren't trained to be managers. I think professors can get away with poor management skills because their staff -- grad students and post docs, mainly -- really want to accomplish things and meet goals. Technicians, on the other hand, typically don't have that same motivation. That it how it should be, but it changes what the PI needs to do to keep the lab rolling.
In summary, I like my lab because we share common interests. Happy Thanksgiving.
3 comments:
Nice post. My postdoc lab had a completely different focus to the rest of the department, which contained multiple labs working on very similar stuff. We definitely felt like outsiders sometimes. Attendance at the seminars we gave was lower etc. I once had a conversation with a senior grad student from another lab, and he said that he kinda liked our labs' presentations because they were soooo different to what he was doing, but he found them much more difficult to follow and didn't like it when too many of them bunched together. He then had a major epiphany: "hang on, is that what it's like for you guys all the time?" Um, yeah, and we didn't skip seminars...
There would also be other incidents such as a paper coming out in Science that was relevant to all the labs except ours, on the day our institutional subscription expired. I had multiple people ask me if I'd managed to download "that PDF", and they were all absolutely astonished that I didn't know which paper they were talking about.
Sorry for ranting - I'm glad you have people to talk to about your research!
This is all too familiar! In my department, my lab is the only one in our subfield and we are only tangentially related to all others. Within my lab, everyone else works in the University lab, while I did all my work at a remote lab 3000 miles away. This has been difficult for me (the practical details discussed in lab meetings are sooo boring when you don't work in that lab!) but it fosters independence as well- a critical skill for running our own labs someday.
That said, I seriously can't wait (!) to get to my postdoc lab which is one of 4 in the subfield and all 7 of us in the lab work on one system!!
I'm glad you guys know what I meant. It's good to be reminded that things change over time, although for me I hope they don't change too much (EGM is another story).
Post a Comment