The Medium:
1. We discussed the first draft of my manuscript at lab meeting (led by Academic Advisor, not Research Advisor). It was a good experience; I got lots of constructive comments. I had asked them to focus on big picture issues, like organization, consistency, data interpretation, main themes, etc., rather than details since the paper is at an early stage (I don’t want to polish sentences that might just get deleted). Some people marked up stupid style and formatting stuff anyway, but at least they read it. We haven’t discussed many working drafts in our lab meetings, so AA used my manuscript as a tool to teach everyone some broad writing lessons. Some examples:
- Title, abstract, first pragraph of intro, first paragraph of results, first and last paragraphs of discussion, and conclusion should all match and contain the same point(s).
- Avoid starting major sections with “negative” statements. For instance, “this bad disease disfigures hundreds of people every year” is not positive. AA claims that the papers that come off as most exciting and interesting phrase things in a positive way.
- This one is more obvious, but apparently I had trouble with it: determine your audience and write with the appropriate degree of detail. I guess I mixed general ideas that would appeal to a broad audience with finer points that would bore everyone but specialists in my subdiscipline.
So the lab meeting was mostly good, but today I felt a little overwhelmed when I started to attack the problems. I will basically have to rewrite the paper, which is fine because it will get so much better, but I need to develop a strategy. AA said he would email me his specific comments – they might help me figure out where to start. I currently feel frustrated.
2. I have been making slow progress on the crummy, tedious, boring, dirty project (see progress meter at sidebar). Today I worked on the Worst Samples Ever. My plan was to chip away on this project while working on manuscript revisions. It’s bench work that I usually sort of enjoy and that a trained monkey could do, so I figured it would be a good way to spread out the difficult rewriting while still moving forward on something. But today’s samples were so crappy that it only added to my overall frustration. I really want to finish with these fuckers.
The Good:
1. My fellowship got renewed for one more year. Yay! This is a big relief.
2. My BFF invited me to go on vacation with her and her parents this summer, at the same time that Ecogeoman is going to Far Off Land. I’d only have to pay for myself to get there and maybe chip in for food. EGM and I had basically decided that I should not go to Far Off Land with him (too expensive) so I’m excited to go to Florida instead. :)
3. I was in a really sour mood when I got home today, so EGM and I got beer and dinner at our favorite neighborhood bar. Then we got ice cream -- yum. I feel much better now.
9 comments:
Sounds like a pretty good day. Points for ecogeofemme!
Congrats on the fellowship...that's awesome! And it sounds like the manuscript review session went well.
One night during my postdoc, when I was spending five hours feeding tubes one-by-one into a machine, I had the same thought that a trained monkey could do my job. That was when I had my epiphany: I am the trained monkey. :-)
funny how some people pick on details even though you clearly ask them not to bother...I have a couple of colleagues like that and it's just no point asking them for comments
I'm an obsessive compulsive editor and proofreader and I find it really hard not to mark those things up, even when I'm looking for big picture issues. (See today's post on bad language use on the BBC website for illustration - I just wanted to know the score!). I usually end up editing once for nitpicky errors and then re-reading it for the big picture once I'm satisfied that everything else is taken care of.
Yay you on the fellowship renewal! That's great! I'm glad you celebrated in style with beer and ice cream!
Congrats on the fellowship renewal! And yay for trips with the bff!
I'm always frustrated when I have to rewrite a manuscript. I guess the skeleton that the manuscript looked like before was good practice in organizing your ideas and we have all read that writing isn't writing without rewriting but I'm always sad when so much has to be rewritten. I've found that it's sometimes best just to delete everything (besides methods) and start fresh then trying to salvage too much. Good luck!
congrats on the fellowhsip and good luck with the writing
Good to hear your fellowship got renewed. And vacation in Summer sounds fantastic. I'm glad you won't be left alone while EGM goes off. ANd it sounds to me like the review of your paper went well too. You may have to re-write most of it, but it'll be so much better for the effort. Congrats on both!
Wish I had ever, even once, had multiple people read my manuscripts that helpfully and discuss as a group.
You're in a great situation. Milk it for all it is worth.
And try to learn to enjoy rewriting. It can actually be fun.
And congrats on funding for another year. That's huge.
Bummer about the crappy samples. I have a project that is bogged down by something similar, I keep wondering if there is anything I can do to work around it, rather than trying to brute force my way through. =(
Post a Comment